Legal Opinion

Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 25, 1903No. 59PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

This is an action in equity to restrain the defendant from the publication of circulars and letters asserting the violation by the complainant of the defendant’s rights under letters patent, and threatening the complainant’s customers with suits. The court below dismissed the bill.

The facts bring it within the principle of the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in a suit brought in the District of New Jersey against the present defendant. The doctrine there declared is well settled by the authorities, and the opinion in that case contains a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. American Malting Co. v. KeitelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  2. Kaplan v. Helenhart Novelty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. A. L. Smith Iron Co. v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Zenie Bros. v. MiskendDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API