Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. Helenhart Novelty Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 5, 1950No. 21597_1PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, .Circuit Judge.
The two questions to be answered on this appeal are whether there is federal jurisdiction of all of the .causes of action alleged in the complaint and in the counterclaim and whether a temporary injunction was improvidently granted on motion of the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs, who are partners in business under the firm name of The Plastrix Company and are both residents of New York, brought this suit in the District Court for the Southern District of New York against defendants, a New York corporation and one of its officers, also a New York resident, for a declaratory…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Zalkind v. ScheinmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Zenith Electronics Corporation, and Elo Touchsystems, Inc. v. Exzec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., and Jerry A. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Mikohn Gaming Corporation v. Acres Gaming, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. Harmonic Design, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.