McVea v. Nickols
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.
In this action the plaintiff recovered a verdict against the defendant for $3,500, on account of injuries sustained through being struck and knocked down by an automobile operated by defendant. Upon the hearing of the usual motion, the court ordered a new trial unless the plaintiff remitted one-half of the amount of the verdict. The plaintiff consented and thereupon the motion for new trial was denied. The defendant has appealed from the judgment based upon the verdict, as thus altered.
It appears from the evidence that about 8 o’clock on the evening of January 15, 1928, the defendant was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Williamson v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hausken v. ComanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Levens v. StoccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- M & M Livestock Transport Co. v. California Auto Transport Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Buchignoni v. DeHavenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.