Legal Opinion
Levens v. Stocco
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 1, 1935No. Civ. 9479PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff was injured in a collision between an automobile, in which he was a passenger, and a truck operated by defendant Stocco, who was then in the employ of defendant Frosini. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $2,800. Defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied, and they have appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict.
As the ground for their appeal they contend that plaintiff’s counsel was guilty of prejudicial misconduct by inquiring of a prospective juror as to his interest in a particular insurance company.
The juror was asked if he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Aydlott v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Dermer v. PistoresiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- McVea v. NickolsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Olguin v. ThygesenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Jones v. BayleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Kroplin v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Mullanix v. BasichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.