Legal Opinion
Hausken v. Coman
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1936No. File No. 6379PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action for personal injury. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendants appeal.
The complaint alleges that on the 6th day of November, 1934 Hans Jacob Hausken, the husband of the plaintiff, was lawfully, and with the exercise of due care, proceeding on foot upon that certain highway known as U.S. Highway No.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Knapp v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Beeman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Jaskoviak v. GruverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Jaskoviak v. GruverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Thompson v. NettumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.