Legal Opinion

M & M Livestock Transport Co. v. California Auto Transport Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1955No. Docket Nos. L.A. 23197, 23198PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Conron, Heard & James and Calvin H. Conron for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Defendants appeal from judgments awarding plaintiffs Baker and M & M Livestock Transport Company damages for harm to their trucks arising out of a collision in which three other trucks were involved. The cases were consolidated for trial by the court sitting without a jury.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiffs the following appears: The collision occurred about 2 p. m. on a clear day on Highway 466 in the Tehachapi Mountains. The highway ran generally in an east-west direction and was marked with a broken center line. At the point of impact *849it was about 34 feet wide including the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gyerman v. United States Lines Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hughes v. MacDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Dziura v. California Aviation Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API