M & M Livestock Transport Co. v. California Auto Transport Co.
California Supreme Court
Conron, Heard & James and Calvin H. Conron for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Defendants appeal from judgments awarding plaintiffs Baker and M & M Livestock Transport Company damages for harm to their trucks arising out of a collision in which three other trucks were involved. The cases were consolidated for trial by the court sitting without a jury.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiffs the following appears: The collision occurred about 2 p. m. on a clear day on Highway 466 in the Tehachapi Mountains. The highway ran generally in an east-west direction and was marked with a broken center line. At the point of impact *849it was about 34 feet wide including the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Gyerman v. United States Lines Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Hughes v. MacDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Dziura v. California Aviation Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.