Legal Opinion
State of California v. Industrial Acc. Com.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1961No. Civ. 10177PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARNS, J. pro tem. *
By means of certiorari the petitioner seeks to review the order of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California awarding Harry C. Cruse compensation for industrial injury.
The instant claim was designated as “SACO 8514” by the Industrial Accident Commission and was consolidated for hearing with “SACO 7373,” which was a proceeding pur suant to section 21026 of the Government Code, whereby the Board of Administrators of the State Employees’ Retirement System petitioned the Industrial Accident Commission for a determination of the question whether or not Harry…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holloway Et Ux v. WetzelUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Crow v. City of LynwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Board of Administration v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by6 opinions
- Collier v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- California Sansome Co. Polk Market Co. v. U.S. Gypsum W.R. Grace & Company,--Conn.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Pizza Hut of San Diego, Inc. v. Workers Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 12 v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.