Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1924No. Civ. No. 4615PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Certiorari. The point which is suggested by counsel for petitioner, and which is accepted by respondent as being proper for the consideration of this court, has to do with the statute of limitations. Ordinarily it might be contended that a writ of certiorari would not lie herein; but in view of the fact that .the controversy arises under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Stats. 1917, p. 831) and that the ordinary functions of the writ of certiorari are largely extended by its provisions as affecting cases arising thereunder, together with the further consideration that both the supreme court…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Knight v. YounkinIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Carter v. Associated Petroleum CarriersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. Kindall v. McBirneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API