Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1918No. S. F. No. 8534PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Review directed to the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

A writ of certiorari issued from this court to review the action of the Industrial Accident Commission, by judgment of two of the members thereof, awarding compensation to one Lawrence Knudsen against the petitioner here, the insurance carrier for the employers of said Knudsen.

There is no dispute concerning the essential facts, the one question being whether or not the claim of Knudsen was barred by the limiting section of the industrial compensation law.. The majority of the commissioners found that the applicant was injured on June 29, 1916; that formal application for compensation was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ehrhart v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Heine Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Chisholm v. Vocational School for GirlsMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Vang Construction Co. v. MarcocciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. State of California v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API