Legal Opinion
Board of Administration v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 1961No. Civ. 10175PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAR.NE, J. pro tem. *
is a petition for review of findings of fact made and entered by the Industrial Accident Commission (SACO 7373), wherein it was found that Harry C. Cruse sustained injury arising out of and occurring in the course of his employment, said injury consisting of aggravation of a preexisting heart condition.
The record discloses that Harry Cruse, a highway patrolman employed by the State of California, applied to petitioner for industrial disability retirement. Pursuant to Government Code, section 21026, petitioner applied to the Industrial Accident Commission for determination…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pearl v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- State of California v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Mel v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Pearl v. WCABCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1989