Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Oroudjian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2011No. 09-57022PublishedCited by 275 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Cecil Ingram and The Fair Housing Council of the San Fernando Valley (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order awarding them attorney fees following settlement of their claims against Armine Oroudjian and Antony Abelyan (“Appellees”) brought under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619, and California law.
Ingram, disabled and confined to a wheelchair, lives in an apartment owned by Oroudjian and managed by Abelyan. In May of 2008, Ingram’s bank did not honor his rent check and the landlord initiated an unlawful detainer action against Ingram in state court. While the state…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In The Matter Of U.S. Golf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- JULIE PARKE, — v. FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, — JULIE PARKE, — v. FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, —Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by275 opinions
- Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of AzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- A. D. v. State of Calif. Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Monterrubio v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Krystal Gurule v. Land Guardian, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Daniel Vargas v. Amber HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
270 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.