Legal Opinion

A. D. v. State of Calif. Highway Patrol

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2013No. 09-16460, 09-17635PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

A police officer, who violates another’s constitutional right, will receive qualified immunity from suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if the right the officer violated was not protected by clearly established law at the time he acted. See Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232, 129 S.Ct. 808, 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009). Since 1998, clear precedent has established that a police officer violates the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause if he kills a suspect when acting with the purpose to harm, unrelated to a legitimate law enforcement objective. Therefore, once a jury…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Robert Reese, Jr. v. County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Merritt Sharp, III v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. S.R. Nehad v. Neal BrowderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Maria Morales v. Sonya FryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API