Kingsley v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
DEVANY, Justice.
Robert Irving Kingsley was tried before a jury and convicted of “purchase of a child.” TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 25.06 (Vernon Supp.1987). Punishment was assessed at seven years’ imprisonment and a $5,000 fine. Appellant’s seven points of error may be summarized as follows: (1) section 25.06 of the penal code is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad; (2) the indictment should have been quashed; (3) the jury panel should have been quashed; and (4) unadjudicated extraneous offenses were improperly admitted during the punishment phase of the trial. For the reasons stated below, we…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Chambliss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Hartis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Hartman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.