Legal Opinion

Kingsley v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided November 6, 1987No. 05-86-01047-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVANY, Justice.

Robert Irving Kingsley was tried before a jury and convicted of “purchase of a child.” TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 25.06 (Vernon Supp.1987). Punishment was assessed at seven years’ imprisonment and a $5,000 fine. Appellant’s seven points of error may be summarized as follows: (1) section 25.06 of the penal code is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad; (2) the indictment should have been quashed; (3) the jury panel should have been quashed; and (4) unadjudicated extraneous offenses were improperly admitted during the punishment phase of the trial. For the reasons stated below, we…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Chambliss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Hartis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Hartman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API