Legal Opinion
City of West Hollywood v. Beverly Towers, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1991No. S011689PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
Defendants, the owners of apartment buildings in the City of West Hollywood (City), seek review of a Court of Appeal judgment ordering them to comply with a City ordinance requiring a conditional use permit for the conversion of apartments into condominiums. Defendants contend they are exempt from the ordinance because at the time it was enacted they had secured final subdivision map approval and permission from the California Department of Real Estate to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Youngblood v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. MunroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Estate of RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Independent Housing Services v. Fillmore Center AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Santa Margarita Area Residents Together v. San Luis Obispo County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- El Dorado Palm Springs, Ltd. v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. Thomas Shelton Powers, M.D., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.