Legal Opinion
Russ Building Partnership v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1988No. S000156PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROUSSARD, J.
In this case we are called upon to decide whether San Francisco’s Transit Impact Development Fee (TIDF) ordinance may be applied to projects which, at the time of the enactment, were in the course of construction pursuant to building permits conditioned on the developers’ participation “in a downtown assessment district, or similar fair and appropriate mechanism, to provide funds for maintaining and augmenting transportation service . . . .” We conclude that the condition encompasses the TIDF, and therefore hold that the TIDF may be imposed on the projects without…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.