Legal Opinion

Cherry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 1992No. Docket 135963PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from a circuit court affirmance of a district court grant of summary disposition for defendant of plaintiff’s complaint for first-party no-fault insurance benefits, MCR 2.116(0(10). We affirm.

In granting leave, we ordered the parties to address the following issue:

Under § 3107 of the Insurance Code [MCL 500.3107; MSA 24.13107], is an insured’s right to personal protection insurance benefits for otherwise reasonably necessary products, services, and accommodations for the injured person’s care, recovery or rehabilitation, based on otherwise reasonable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Guitar v. BieniekMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kirksey v. Manitoba Public InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Leonard v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  5. Attorney General v. RaguckasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Healing Place at North Oakland Medical Center v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Pointe Physical Therapy, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  4. Miller v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Miller v. Allstate Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API