Legal Opinion

Kirksey v. Manitoba Public Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1991No. Docket 117428PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, P.J.

A district court jury awarded plaintiff, Arnold Kirksey, no-fault work- loss benefits for a disabling injury he suffered when he fell from a truck. On appeal, the circuit court reversed. We reverse the circuit court decision and reinstate the jury verdict.

The two critical issues in this case involve § 3107(b) of the no-fault act, MCL 500.3107(b); MSA 24.13107(b). We are asked to determine whether a person is entitled to increased wage-loss benefits under § 3107(b) upon a showing that, had he not been injured, his income would have increased. If so, we consider whether plaintiff presented…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gobler v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moghis v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Cole v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Lewis v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Brown v. Home-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Cherry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Bak v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Ward v. Titan InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API