Legal Opinion

Miller v. Allstate Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2007No. Docket No. 259992PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

This appeal is before us on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court. Defendant Allstate Insurance Company had appealed as of right the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary disposition and granting summary disposition in favor of cross-plaintiff PT Works, Inc. As reflected in our prior opinion, “the sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that PT Works was entitled to receive insurance benefits from Allstate under the no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et seq., for physical therapy services provided by PT Works to plaintiff William Miller, who was insured by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kreiner v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Johnnie F Shinholster v. Annapolis HospMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Gleason v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. William Miller v. Allstate Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Healing Place at North Oakland Medical Center v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Hogg v. Four Lakes Association, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Miller v. Allstate Ins. Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Psychosocial Service Associates, PC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API