Legal Opinion

Hofmann v. Auto Club Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1995No. Docket 150304, 151033, 151268PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals and cross appeal from a bench trial judgment and order amending the judgment, we are asked to construe various provisions of Michigan’s no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq., and the Public Health Code relative to the practice of chiropractic, MCL 333.16401 et seq.; MSA 14.15(16401) et seq., in order to determine whether the expenses for various health-care products and services that were provided by plaintiffs to defendant’s insureds during the course of chiropractic care are subject to payment as a no-fault benefit. We also are asked, inter…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Advocacy Organization for Patients & Providers v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Holland v. Trinity Health Care Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API