Hofmann v. Auto Club Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In these consolidated appeals and cross appeal from a bench trial judgment and order amending the judgment, we are asked to construe various provisions of Michigan’s no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq., and the Public Health Code relative to the practice of chiropractic, MCL 333.16401 et seq.; MSA 14.15(16401) et seq., in order to determine whether the expenses for various health-care products and services that were provided by plaintiffs to defendant’s insureds during the course of chiropractic care are subject to payment as a no-fault benefit. We also are asked, inter…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Advocacy Organization for Patients & Providers v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Holland v. Trinity Health Care Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.