Legal Opinion
DiRienzo Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 29, 2010No. AC 29960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendants, Salce Contracting Associates, Inc. (Salce), and its surety, United States *165Fidelity & Guaranty Company (surety), appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, DiRienzo Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (DiRienzo). On appeal, the defendants claim that the court erred in (1) failing to apply certain provisions of the contract, (2) finding that (a) DiRienzo was due $60,500 in retainage and (b) DiRienzo was due $68,228.80 for its change order concerning duct work and piping for the air conditioning system and (3) making certain…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Cantonbury Heights Condominium Ass'n v. Local Land Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- HLO Land Ownership Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doe v. BemerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Wyatt Energy, Inc. v. Motiva Enterprises, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- MSO, LLC v. DeSIMONEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Corneroli v. KutzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Dirienzo Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.