Legal Opinion

Faircloth Ex Rel. Faircloth v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1957No. 174PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

For reasons readily apparent, the Court has encountered difficulty in laying down hard and fast rules governing liability in train-automobile grade crossing accidents. “Many cases involving injuries due to collision between motor vehicles and trains at grade crossings have found their way to this Court. No good can be obtained from attempting to analyze the close distinctions drawn in the decisions of these cases, for, as was said in Cole v. Koonce, supra, 214 N.C. 188, each case must stand upon its own bottom, and be governed by the controlling facts there appearing.” Hampton v. Hawkins, 219…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Hampton v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Henderson Ex Rel. Utley v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Johnson Sons, Inc. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shutka v. Pennsylvania RR Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. AdcockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. High v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Owens v. NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API