Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Defendant Railroad was under a duty to give timely warning when its train approached the visually obstructed and much traveled Rose Street crossing. Cox v. Gallamore, 267 N.C. 537, 148 S.E. 2d 616; Jarrett v. R. R., 254 N.C. 493, 119 S.E. 2d 383; High v. R. R., 248 N.C. 414; 103 S.E. 2d 498; Summerlin v. R. R., 238 N.C. 438, 78 S.E. 2d 162; 6 Strong, N. C. Index Railroads § 6 (2d ed. 1968). Assuming the truth of plaintiffs’ evidence, as we must in passing upon a motion for nonsuit, it would justify a finding by the jury that defendant failed to give any warning as its locomotive approached…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Hampton v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Henderson Ex Rel. Utley v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Jeffries v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Johnson v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. O'Boyle Tank Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Broadway v. Blythe Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Neal v. BoothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Sharpe Ex Rel. Sharpe v. Quality Education, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Robert Earle Hunter v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.