Legal Opinion

Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 11, 1970No. 25PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Defendant Railroad was under a duty to give timely warning when its train approached the visually obstructed and much traveled Rose Street crossing. Cox v. Gallamore, 267 N.C. 537, 148 S.E. 2d 616; Jarrett v. R. R., 254 N.C. 493, 119 S.E. 2d 383; High v. R. R., 248 N.C. 414; 103 S.E. 2d 498; Summerlin v. R. R., 238 N.C. 438, 78 S.E. 2d 162; 6 Strong, N. C. Index Railroads § 6 (2d ed. 1968). Assuming the truth of plaintiffs’ evidence, as we must in passing upon a motion for nonsuit, it would justify a finding by the jury that defendant failed to give any warning as its locomotive approached…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Hampton v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Henderson Ex Rel. Utley v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Jeffries v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Johnson v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. O'Boyle Tank Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Broadway v. Blythe Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Neal v. BoothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Sharpe Ex Rel. Sharpe v. Quality Education, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Robert Earle Hunter v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API