Murchison National Bank of Wilmington v. Clark
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Let it be observed in limine that this is not a contest between the Murchison National Bank, a creditor of the contractor, and the surety company over the retained percentages in the hands of the owner, or the balance due the contractor and withheld under the contract. It is alleged that more than said balance was required to complete the contract after the failure and adjudication in bankruptcy of the contractor. Nor is it a case where moneys have been advanced for the payment of laborers and materialmen and assignments taken of tbeir claims against tbe contractor. Trust Co. v. Porter, 191…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Shannon v. AbramsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LincolnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- First National Bank of Chisholm v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- National Surety Co. v. Jackson County BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- R. L. Snelson & Co. v. R. G. Hill & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Ins. Co. v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.