Legal Opinion
First National Bank of Chisholm v. O'Neil
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 25, 1929No. 26,965PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
On June 29, 1925, defendant O’Neil entered into a contract with the state through the commissioner of highways to construct a section of trunk highway No. 34, and on the same date O’Neil as principal and defendant corporation as surety executed to the state the bond required by statute to secure the performance of the contract. To secure the surety against loss, O’Neil, in his application for the bond, assigned and transferred to the surety all property and equipment used or to be used in performing the contract, and stipulated that in case of any default on his part the surety…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. SchlesingerOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- National Live Stock Insurance v. SimmonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Hagquist v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States ex rel. First Continental National Bank & Trust Co. v. Western Contracting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- First Nat. Bank of Dothan v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Norton v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- United States v. Western Contracting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Farmers State Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.