Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Lincoln

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1932No. 3 Div. 970PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS. J.

The bill is for the enforcement of a lien or collateral pledge of “all moneys due or to become due” on the described public construction contract.

It has been declared by this court that under section 8935, Code, any lien may be enforced in equity. McLendon v. Truckee Land Co., 216 Ala. 589, 114 So. 3, an attorney’s lien; Broglan v. City of Huntsville, 218 Ala. 9, 117 So. 419, an assessment lien; Wade v. Kay, 210 Ala. 122, 97 So. 129, an attorney’s lien; Wilkins v. Folsom, 208 Ala. 24, 93 So. 547, enforcement of a tax lien; Rowe v. Bank of New Brockton, 207 Ala. 384, 92 So. 643, on…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Emmert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Bankers' Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. SlossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Montgomery v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Schwab v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Turner v. Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API