Legal Opinion

Frisch v. Rutgers Village

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 20, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

8 N.J. Super. 392 (1950)

73 A.2d 83

J. ADAM FRISCH AND FLORENCE B. FRISCH, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

RUTGERS VILLAGE, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND FLANDERS HOLDING CO., INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided April 20, 1950.

Mr. John T. Keefe, for plaintiffs.

Messrs. R.E. & A.D. Watson (Mr. Mortimer Eisner, of counsel), for defendant Flanders Holding Co., Inc.

Mr. David T. Wilentz, by Mr. Arthur J. Sills, for defendant Rutgers Village.

Mr. Arthur J. Sills, for defendant First Savings & Loan, &c.

HANEMAN, J.S.C.

The plaintiffs here seek to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scull v. EilenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  2. Underwood v. Herman & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  3. Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Lennig v. Ocean City Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
  5. Clarke v. KurtzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Hammett v. RosensohnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Anders v. Greenlands Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. Mountain Springs Assn. v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. Amir v. D'AGOSTINONew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API