Clarke v. Kurtz
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Case, J.
Benjamin Kurtz is the owner of a lot of land in the city of Camden, whereon John Cazello, the lessee, in conjunction with Frank Caromano, proposes to open a saloon and sell intoxicating liquors under a license heretofore granted to Caromano: The bill, filed by several owners of lots in the same tract, sought to enjoin the proposed use as contrary to a restrictive covenant which appears infra. Chancery dismissed the bill. Complainants appeal.
The lands of the complainants, as well as that of defendant Kurtz, all came from a tract owned and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davenport v. New England Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
- Hills v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Schwoerer v. Boylston Market Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pitts v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Olson v. JantauschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Committee for a Better Twin Rivers v. Twin Rivers Homeowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Township of Piscataway v. Duke EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.