Legal Opinion

Hammett v. Rosensohn

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 7, 1957PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

46 N.J. Super. 527 (1957)

135 A.2d 6

JOHN E. HAMMETT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,

v.

JAMES ROSENSOHN AND FLORENTINE R. ROSENSOHN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 4, 1957.

Decided October 7, 1957.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Francis E. Bright argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant (Messrs. Dolan & Dolan, attorneys; Mr. Bright, of counsel).

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for the defendants-appellants and cross-respondents (Mr. Weiss, attorney and of counsel).

The opinion…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. General Public Loan Corp. v. Director of the Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Fortesque v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  3. Hyland v. FondaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Underwood v. Herman & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  5. Glorieux v. LighthipeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Highland Lakes Country Club & Community Ass'n v. FranzinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. Caullett v. Stanley Stilwell & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Cragmere Holding Corp. v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Camp Clearwater, Inc. v. PlockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Bruno v. HannaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API