In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G. and C.G.L.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
A court cannot terminate a person’s parental rights unless the State proves by clear and convincing evidence that the parent engaged in certain proscribed conduct, as specified in the Family Code, and that termination is in the best interest of the children. In this case, an immigrant convicted in another state of unlawful conduct with a minor and given a probated sentence years before his children were born was later deported to Mexico. The State relied on these facts in petitioning to terminate this father’s parental rights, yet put on no evidence concerning the offense committed years…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by475 opinions
- In the Interest of E.C.R., ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- In the Interest of R.S.-T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In the Interest of S.J.R.-Z.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In the Interest of M.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- in the Interest of D.N. and D.N., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2013
470 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.