In the Interest of E.C.R., Child
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson
We require the State to overcome significant burdens before removing a child from his parent. These impediments are essential to protect the parent’s fundamental liberty interest in the companionship, care, custody, and management of her children. 1 But “[j]ust as it is imperative for courts to recognize the constitutional underpinnings of the parent-child relationship, it is also essential that emotional and physical interests of the child not be sacrificed merely to preserve that right.” In re C.H., 89 S.W.3d 17, 26 (Tex.2002). 2
The Family Code allows a court to terminate a parent’s rights…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by404 opinions
- in the Interest of K.M.L., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- In the Interest of J.M.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- in the Interest of S.M.R., G.J.R. and C.N.R., ChildrenTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Ralph S. Janvey, in His Capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford International Bank, Limited Official Stanford Investors Committee v. the Golf Channel, Incorporated Tgc, L.L.C., Doing Business as Golf ChannelTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- in the Interest of N.T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
399 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.