Legal Opinion

Gunter v. Dayco Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 12, 1986No. 99A85PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Defendants seek reversal of the Commission’s award of workers’ compensation to plaintiff for temporary total disability suffered as a result of a ruptured tendon. The sole issue before this Court is whether plaintiff suffered “injury by accident” within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.C.G.S. § 2(6). We hold that he did.

I

The facts are not controverted. Plaintiff was employed under a contract which stated that before he could be laid off he was entitled to displace another employee in a different department with less union seniority than he. As a result of economic…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Adams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Slade v. Willis Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Derebery v. Pitt County Fire MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Lineback v. Wake County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Church v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Cody v. Snider Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API