Legal Opinion

Neely v. City of Statesville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1937PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBOENE, J.

Tbe sole question on this appeal is: Did tbe death of William Lloyd Neely result from “injury by accident” within tbe meaning of tbe North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act? We think not.

There is no controversy as to tbe fact that tbe death arose out of and in tbe course of tbe employment. Hence, inquiry is as to what is such “injury by accident.” C. S., 8081 (i, subsec. f). Tbe meaning of that term is clearly and fully discussed and treated by Stacy, C. J., in tbe case of Slade v. Hosiery Mills, 209 N. C., 823, 184 S. E., 844. Tbe fact situation of that case is on almost “all-fours” witb…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slade v. Willis Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Duncan v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Smith v. Cabarrus Creamery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API