Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Mees
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 5, 1951No. 35,494PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Justice.
This appeal raises issues concerning the power of the railroad and warehouse commission to initiate and conduct an ex parte investigation into the management of a carrier subject to its supervision without giving notice to the carrier or joining it as a party in an adversary proceeding, and its power to issue compulsory process in aid thereof to persons not subject to its regulation.
On August 22, 1950, at one of its regular meetings, the railroad and warehouse commission, hereinafter referred to as the commission, upon its own motion and without issuing a complaint,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Electric Bond & Share Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- State Ex Rel. State Board of Tax Commission v. Daviess Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- In Re Application of Waterfront Com'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.