Legal Opinion
La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-General
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1961PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
La Belle Creole International, S. A., the petitioner herein, brought this proceeding to vacate a subpoena duces tecum served upon its president by the Attorney-General, commanding it to testify and produce its records and books. The court at Special Term denied the motion and the Appellate Division reversed and directed that the subpoena be vacated. In this court, the petitioner advances two contentions — and it is to them alone that we direct our attention—- first, that the subpoena is unconstitutionally vague and indefinite and, second, that, being a foreign corporation not doing business…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Kapon v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nicholson v. State Commission on Judicial ConductNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Virag v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Santangello v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.