Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Hopper

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1938No. 2331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

The appellee, plaintiff below, commenced an action in the district court of Honolulu against appellant for recovery of the value of necessaries alleged to have been furnished to appellant’s wife. It is alleged that the necessaries were supplied to appellant’s wife over a period of six months, that is, from June 13, 1936, to December 13 of the same year. The account for each month, amounting to $75, is set forth in a separate count in the complaint. The first count, which is similar in language to the others, is as follows : “That heretofore and on or about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forrester v. HurttHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Kekoa v. BordenHawaii Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Larrisch v. SchaeferHawaii Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Borba v. LealHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Thompson v. GillHawaii Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ing v. ChungHawaii Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API