Larrisch v. Schaefer
Hawaii Supreme Court
on Appeal from Police Justice of Honolulu.
1Opinion of the Court
Decision of
Judd, J.,
on Motion.
Defendant’s counsel moves to dismiss the summons on the ground that it does not apprise the defendant what the plaintiff seeks — that is, it asks for nothing. Plaintiff’s counsel contends that as the summons issues from the Police Justice, upon an oral complaint, he is not responsible for its defects; and as this case is appealed on the merits, this motion is too late.
I am of the opinion that if the plaintiff files a written complaint, the summons issued by the magistrate need only recite that the plaintiff claims as by the annexed complaint; but if the summons…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Peterson v. Lau TongHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
- Wong Young v. Kum ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
- MacIel v. TellesHawaii Supreme Court · 1928
- Wilson v. HopperHawaii Supreme Court · 1938