Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Hurtt

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

EXCEPTIONS PROM ClECuiT ÜOURT, FlKST OIRCUIT.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WILDER, J.

Tliis is an action for tbe reasonable value of medical services-furnished by plaintiff to the wife of defendant while she was-living separate and apart from her husband. The trial was had before the circuit court, jury waived. The findings of fact by the court are substantially as follows: That plaintiff, a duly licensed physician, practicing in Pomona, California, furnished professional treatment to the wife of defendant on the credit of her husband during the months of August and September, 1903 that in September, 1902, the wife of defendant, with his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re DoleHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Inhabitants of Sturbridge v. FranklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Baker v. BarneyNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  4. Lockwood v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  5. Peaks v. MayhewSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrews v. WhitneyHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Vivas v. KauhimahuHawaii Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Simms v. SimmsHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ing v. ChungHawaii Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Wilson v. HopperHawaii Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API