Yerys v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the case: The defense of invalidity is not available to the defendant in the present action. Mauney v. Ins. Co., 209 N. C., 499, 184 S. E., 82; Wamboldt v. Ins. Co., 191 N. C., 32, 131 S. E., 395; Hardy v. Ins. Co., 180 N. C., 180, 104 S. E., 166; Amer. Trust Co. v. Ins. Co., 173 N. C., 558, 92 S. E., 706. Neither is it entitled to be heard again on the question of reformation or cancellation, nor on the subject of its counterclaims. These matters were considered in a forum of its own choosing. They are now res judicata. Bunker v. Bunker, 140 N. C., 18, 52 S. E.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Southern Distributing Co. v. CarrawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Bethell v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Royster v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Hardy v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Williamson v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- In Re YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943