Williamson v. City of High Point
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Tbe position of appellant that tbe court was without authority to modify tbe decree entered at tbe February Term is correct. Yerys v. Ins. Co., 210 N. C., 442, 187 S. E., 583; Southerland v. R. R., 148 N. C., 442, 62 S. E., 517; 32 C. J., 506. Tbe basis for tbe final decree was, that tbe original undertaking “goes far beyond tbe powers conferred by tbe Eevenue Bond Act of 1935, and is ultra vires." But as we understand tbe record, tbe defendants’ prayer to this effect was disregarded, and rightly so.
Tbe sole question before tbe Court was whether tbe final decree entered at tbe February Term…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southerland v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Barrone v. Moseley Bros.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Yerys v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Bacon v. Onset Bay Grove Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- McGuinn v. . High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- In Re CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- McGuinn v. . High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.