Royster v. . Wright
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ACTION, pending in EdgecoMbe Superior Court, and beard before Boykin, J., at Fall Term, 1895, upon motion for reference, &c. The motion was refused and plaintiff appealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Chief Justice Faibolotii.
1Opinion of the Court
Faircloth, C. J.:
This action is brought by the plaint-' iff administrator d. b. n. c. t. a. of O. 0. Farrar against the •defendant executrix of Geoige B. Wright, the original executor of said Farrar, for an account and settlement of the estate of Farrar. The original executor filed some annual returns of his administration with the clerk, and the defendant executrix filed a final return on the 21st of November, 1894, and it appeared that the defendant had been allowed $11,500 as commissions. The executrix moved for the allowance of commissions due her testator, before the clerk, which we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Williams v. . ClouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Clements v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Leak v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Neal v. . BecknellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Bethell v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.