Vance County v. Royster
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
The motion of the petitioner for permission to withdraw its appeal is allowed.
Upon the appeal of the respondents, the ultimate question for decision is not whether it would be beneficial to the economy of Vance County and the City of Henderson for an airport to be constructed at the proposed site. The question is whether the respondents’ property can be taken from them, without their consent, for the purpose of constructing an airport as proposed by the county. It is not a light thing to take property from the owners against their will, even though they be paid therefor the full value of it…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Britt v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Brockenbrough v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- City of Charlotte v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Turner v. . ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Foster v. North Carolina Medical Care CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. Core Banks Club Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Highland Realty, Inc. v. Indianapolis Airport AuthorityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- City of Pocatello v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.