Legal Opinion

State v. Core Banks Club Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1969No. 19PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Defendant demurs to the complaint upon the following grounds: (1) It discloses no statutory authority for the State to condemn its property for the purpose alleged- — -a federally owned park — ; (2) it reveals that the condemnation is not for a State public use; and (3) it fails to allege compliance with statutory requirements, which are conditions precedent to the institution of this action.

We postpone at the outset the basic question whether the law now authorizes the condemnation in suit and advert to defendant’s third ground for demurrer, i.e., that plaintiff has not alleged compliance…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Schooler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Uhlmann v. WrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro v. HaginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Smith v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. General Motors Corporation v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API