In re Tyler
California Supreme Court
Application for the modification of a judgment suspending an attorney at law from practice. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
Proceedings were instituted in this court to disbar the respondent, which resulted in a judgment depriving him of the right to practice as attorney or counselor in any or all of the courts of this state, and *308that he be suspended from the practice for the period of two years from the date of the judgment, “and until the judgment in favor of J. M. Hogan against the said respondent, mentioned and described in the accusation, shall be fully satisfied and paid, if the same shall not have been satisfied during such period of two years.” The facts upon which this judgment was rendered will be found…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowling Green Savings Bank v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Forstman v. . SchultingNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- In re TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Slemmer v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- In re FinckeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Disbarment of Evans & Rogers ex rel. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- In Re SoaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- In Re SteenMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- In re BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1884
- Wilkinson County v. LindseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.