Legal Opinion

In Re Steen

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1931No. Nos. 29417, 29416, 29418-29420PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Acting under a resolution adopted by the State Bar Association, a special committee of that association has instituted in this court a proceeding for the disbarment of the respondent Steen, who is a member of the bar here. The charge against respondent is the bribery by or through him of a state officer. If this charge be true, it would follow that respondent would with equal readiness bribe a witness, or a juror, or, if possible, a judge of a court, wherefore, instead of being a fit minister in the law he would be a menace to its administration.

But the sufficiency of the charge as stating an…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  4. Fuller v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  5. In re StolenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Matter of Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. WadeMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In re LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Board of Bar Admissions v. APPLICANT FMississippi Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API