Legal Opinion

In re Tyler

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1886No. 11442PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Peoceeding for the disbarment of an attorney. The facts are stated in the opinion of the- court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This is an application for the disbarment of George W. Tyler. The accusation is preferred by J. M. Hogan, in which it is stated that he (Hogan) was the plaintiff, and sued Tyler, the defendant, in an action entitled J. M. Hogan v. George W. Tyler, which has been heard and finally determined in this court;, that on the 30th of March, 1882, he recovered a judgmsnt in said action against Tyler in the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco in the sum of $3,862, and $284.10 costs, with interest thereon from, date of judgment; that Tyler, on the 19th of September, 1882, appealed…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. In re Disbarment of Evans & Rogers ex rel. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Friday v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Tyler v. PresleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ex parte TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API