Legal Opinion

Bowling Green Savings Bank v. . Todd

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1873PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The attorneys for the bank had a lien upon the papers in the foreclosure suit not only for the costs and charges in that suit, but for any general balance in other professional business. (Hughes v. Mayre, 3 Tr. R., 275; Howell v. Harding, 8 East, 362; 4 Wait's Prac., 246, 247, and cases cited.) This is not a rule peculiar to attorneys, but applies to an ordinary factor. He has a lien upon goods consigned to and received by him for unpaid balances before accrued. (Knapp v. Alvord, 10 Paige, 205; Brier v. Brooks, 26 Wend., 367.)

But I am not aware of any authority allowing an individual member…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicoll v. NicollCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Knapp v. AlvordNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. In re BleakleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  4. Stage v. StevensCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. In the Matter of the Application of KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  4. Ward v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Brauer v. Hotel Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API