Bowling Green Savings Bank v. . Todd
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The attorneys for the bank had a lien upon the papers in the foreclosure suit not only for the costs and charges in that suit, but for any general balance in other professional business. (Hughes v. Mayre, 3 Tr. R., 275; Howell v. Harding, 8 East, 362; 4 Wait's Prac., 246, 247, and cases cited.) This is not a rule peculiar to attorneys, but applies to an ordinary factor. He has a lien upon goods consigned to and received by him for unpaid balances before accrued. (Knapp v. Alvord, 10 Paige, 205; Brier v. Brooks, 26 Wend., 367.)
But I am not aware of any authority allowing an individual member…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nicoll v. NicollCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- Knapp v. AlvordNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
- In re BleakleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Stage v. StevensCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
3Cited by49 opinions
- Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In the Matter of the Application of KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Ward v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Brauer v. Hotel Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.