Legal Opinion

In re Brown

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prosecution of Melville 0. Erown, an attorney and counselor at law, for applying to the supreme court vile, opprobrious, and Indecent epithets, and for accusing one of the justices of being bribed.

1Opinion of the CourtLacey, C. J.

This is an accusation against Melville C. Brown, an attorney and counselor at law of this court, prosecuted by direction of the court under the act of December 9, 1869. Comp. Laws, 16. The accusation avers inter alia that the respondent, in the presence of divers witnesses, in the city of Cheyenne, in this territory, uttered of and concerning this court, and its decision of a certain cause, the following language: “It is a son of a bitch of a court, — one bribed and the other I don’t know what.” It is further alleged that said words were so spoken with intent to scandalize, traduce, and bring…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Board of Law Examiners v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. State Ex Rel. Dabney v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. In re HickeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. In re SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1904
  5. In re the Contempt of HansonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API