Legal Opinion

State v. Weltzin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 26, 2001No. C5-00-127PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANCASTER, Justice.

A police officer cited appellant Blair Weltzin for underage consumption of alcohol in violation of a state statute, making his behavior a misdemeanor. See Minn. Stat. § 340A.503, subd. 1(a)(2) (2000). At a pretrial hearing, the state moved to amend the charge to a violation of an ordinance that also punished underage consumption but, unlike the statutory charge, did not authorize a penalty of incarceration. Over Weltzin’s objection, the district court allowed the amendment. After a bench trial, Weltzin was convicted of the ordinance violation. He appealed the court’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. City of St. Paul v. WhidbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. In Re the Welfare of D.D.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. WeltzinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Antoine Rumel LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Riley v. JankowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State of Minnesota v. Douglas John OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API