State v. Weltzin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
A police officer cited appellant Blair Weltzin for underage consumption of alcohol in violation of a state statute, making his behavior a misdemeanor. See Minn. Stat. § 340A.503, subd. 1(a)(2) (2000). At a pretrial hearing, the state moved to amend the charge to a violation of an ordinance that also punished underage consumption but, unlike the statutory charge, did not authorize a penalty of incarceration. Over Weltzin’s objection, the district court allowed the amendment. After a bench trial, Weltzin was convicted of the ordinance violation. He appealed the court’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- City of St. Paul v. WhidbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- In Re the Welfare of D.D.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. WeltzinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Antoine Rumel LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Riley v. JankowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State of Minnesota v. Douglas John OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.