Legal Opinion

City of St. Paul v. Whidby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1972No. 43024PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for violating St. Paul City Legislative Code, § 469.01, which prohibits the visiting of a disorderly house. He contends that the district court erred in (1) refusing to instruct the jury that defendant is presumed innocent and must be proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) in instructing the jury that after 6 hours of deliberation it would be permitted to return a verdict upon an agreement by five-sixths of its number; (3) by permitting a police officer who had secured a search warrant to testify as to what he saw when he entered the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. City of St. Paul v. DiBucciSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. City of St. Paul v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. State v. WeltzinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API