Legal Opinion

State v. Weltzin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 2000No. C5-00-127PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORIS 0. HUSPENI, Judge. *

In this appeal from a trial court order finding appellant Blair Christian Weltzin guilty of underage consumption in violation of Duluth, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 8-27(c) (1986), Weltzin contends that he was deprived of his right to a jury trial when the court granted the prosecution’s motion to amend its complaint to charge underage consumption in violation of the Duluth city ordinance rather than under Minn.Stat. § 340A.503, subd. 1(a)(2) (1998). Because the district court did not violate the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure or abrogate Weltzin’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. PetteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. HermeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WeltzinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API